Order for Guest
Your shopping cart is empty.
Institute for Advanced Study Presents

Colin Dayan: Guilty Things (IAS Thursdays)

11/29/18, 3:30 PM

About this event

What kind of legal history might account for the unique and continued practice of forfeiture in the United States? Law enforcement, as many recent writers have argued, has grown increasingly dependent on this fail-safe way to gain revenue, since civil asset forfeiture has few procedural safeguards. Unlike criminal forfeiture (in personam), civil forfeiture generally proceeds against the offending property (in rem), not against the person. A piece of property does not have the rights of a person; so, instead of proving crime beyond “a reasonable doubt,” suspicion equal to “probable cause” is enough. Your property is guilty until you prove it innocent. With civil forfeiture, owners do not have to be charged with a crime, let alone be convicted, to lose homes, cars, cash—or dogs.
 
This effort to sharpen our understanding of dispossession is preeminently a legal project. It takes its meaning and garners its effects from the division between value and disregard, things and persons, human and non-human. In analyzing how legal reasoning has historically contributed to literal expropriation, Professor Dayan will examine the generally invisible nexus of animality, human marginalization, and juridical authority. 

Copresented with the Law School and cosponsored by the Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication and the Department of Political Science.
Event Location
  • Crosby Seminar Room, 240 Northrop
  • 84 Church St SE
  • Minneapolis MN
  • USA - United States